Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:18:10 +0100 From: Mark Rowlands <mark.rowlands@minmail.net> To: "undergra" <undergra@vallesnet.org>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: KERNEL vs KERNCONF Message-ID: <01031620181000.76835@bb-62-5-7-15-bb.tninet.se> In-Reply-To: <01cc01c0ab58$59adad80$0164a8c0@daemon> References: <01cc01c0ab58$59adad80$0164a8c0@daemon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 01:55, undergra wrote: > hi i see the changes between FreeBSD 4.2 and FreeBSD 4.3 BETA. > > one question about .... > > "The "make buildkernel" procedure has changed slightly. It now gets > the name of the configuration(s) to build from the KERNCONF variable > (KERNEL is still valid, but deprecated). " > > why deprecated? > > what are the advantages of calling KERNEL o KERNCONF to that variable? > and it doesnt seem to make any difference, it still compiles GENERIC! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01031620181000.76835>