Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 00:43:56 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists@toco-domains.de> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_Waschb=FCsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de>, FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Commiter needed for PR 200652 Message-ID: <5618432C.3090607@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <5617B984.2010002@toco-domains.de> References: <BAAEFA33-7119-4A3F-AE8F-B7A73A20F547@waschbuesch.de> <5617B8E3.1070801@toco-domains.de> <5617B984.2010002@toco-domains.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > > > On 09.10.2015 14:53, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: >> Hello, >> >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200652 >>> >>> It's glue to use the existing ports >>> >>> p5-CGI-ExtDirect >>> p5-RPC-ExtDirect >>> >>> with plack environment. >>> >>> It's been open since June, so perhaps someone could take pity and >>> commit it? :-D >> >> I'm not a committer, but i take a short look at it. I think you should >> make a little more QA. >> >> First i see there is a PORTEPOCH. Since this is a new port, this line >> should be there. > > There is a "not" missing ;) PORTEPOCH is not required for a new port. From: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html -> It is expected that PORTEPOCH will not be used for the majority of ports, and that sensible use of PORTVERSION can often preempt it becoming necessary if a future release of the software changes the version structure. Regards, -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5618432C.3090607>