From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 11 3:24:54 2000 From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 03:24:49 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9918D37B6C3; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 03:24:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876746E302F; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:23:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA54452; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:21:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Sender: des@ofug.org X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Peter Wemm Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linprocfs placement... References: <200012110932.eBB9WXK25578@mobile.wemm.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 11 Dec 2000 11:21:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: Peter Wemm's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:32:33 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Wemm writes: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > No, because it would need to move again once it's no longer MD. If it > > has to move, move it to sys/compat. > Actually, sys/fs/ would be better.. sys/miscfs, in that case, which is where it started out. But I don't agree, as linprocfs is for Linux compatibility only. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message