Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:43:31 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: resurrecting ion3 port Message-ID: <20091001144331.7464c533@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20091001112549.GG50565@hades.panopticon> References: <20091001112549.GG50565@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:25:49 +0400 Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote: > Hi! > > The ion3 window manager was previously removed from the ports tree > becase of license issues. However, the clauses that causes this > were removed (see [1]), so I think we should add it back. I've > prepared updated version of the port ([2]), but I wanted to check > with you, since azhe was who removed the port and adamw maintained > it. Are there any objections against this port? adamw can also take > maintainership if he feels like so, or I'll maintain it myself. > > [1] http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/ion-general/2009-September/002520.html > [2] http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/ion3.tar > Note: removed adamw@ and ahze@ from Cc - they don't don't need my help. With the standard IANAL disclaimer, it looks to me like the point in the Copyright where he clarifies what a significant change is, pretty much lets us have this software in ports. In particular this: Basic changes that are needed to install or run the software on a target platform, are insignificant. --- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091001144331.7464c533>