From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 13 13:50:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F0D16A474; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:50:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B51E43D53; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:50:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (zion.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5DDoQSY023084; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:50:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: David Xu Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:50:10 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200606131312.k5DDCvbZ034813@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200606131312.k5DDCvbZ034813@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606130950.11435.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.1]); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:50:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1537/Tue Jun 13 07:24:06 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf NOTES files options src/sys/kern kern_clock.c kern_switch.c sched_4bsd.c sched_core.c sched_ule.c src/sys/sys sched.h src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:50:31 -0000 On Tuesday 13 June 2006 09:12, David Xu wrote: > davidxu 2006-06-13 13:12:57 UTC >=20 > FreeBSD src repository >=20 > Modified files: > sys/conf NOTES files options=20 > sys/kern kern_clock.c kern_switch.c sched_4bsd.c=20 > sched_ule.c=20 > sys/sys sched.h=20 > sys/i386/conf GENERIC=20 > sys/amd64/conf GENERIC=20 > Added files: > sys/kern sched_core.c=20 > Log: > Add scheduler CORE, the work I have done half a year ago, recent, > I picked it up again. The scheduler is forked from ULE, but the > algorithm to detect an interactive process is almost completely > different with ULE, it comes from Linux paper "Understanding the > Linux 2.6.8.1 CPU Scheduler", although I still use same word > "score" as a priority boost in ULE scheduler. Is there a particular reason you added sched_tick() instead of doing that work in sched_clock()? =2D-=20 John Baldwin =A0<>< =A0http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" =A0=3D =A0http://www.FreeBSD.org