From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 27 21:58:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3322916A4CE for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:58:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F9343D46 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:58:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adstro@stny.rr.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bgm-69-202-202-235.stny.rr.com [69.202.202.235]) iARLwBNQ015193; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:58:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41A8F869.6060407@stny.rr.com> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:58:01 -0500 From: Adam Stroud User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kees Plonsz References: <200411271432.iAREWIJm029525@nymx04.mgw.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <200411271432.iAREWIJm029525@nymx04.mgw.rr.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACL and tunefs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: adstro@stny.rr.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:58:17 -0000 I dont think the acl got enabled, here is my output from mount: /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, NFS exported, local) Kees Plonsz wrote: >Adam Stroud wrote: > > > >>Kees: >> >>You were right, I did not umount the filesystem first, I dropped into >>single user mode and I thought that did unmount the filesystem. When I >>booted the machine into single the tunefs command seemed to work OK. >> >>However, I still dont get a "+" when I do a long listing of a file and >>the handbook says I should see one. Does this mean that things did not >>take? >> >> >> > > >Check if your acl-option is working with "mount" ( no parameters ) >It should give somthing like: > >/dev/ad1s1g on /mnt (ufs, local, soft-updates, acls) > >Then give the setfacl command on a file: > >setfacl -m u::rwx,g:mail:rw file > >Now you must have a + sign with the "ls -la" command. > >I got error messages when I disabled or enabled acl >on a not-empty filesystem and made a directory listing. > > > > >