From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 14 12:18:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41FE14CA4 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 12:18:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org id 11xyOi-00098I-00; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:18:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA87078 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:18:11 GMT (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:18:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: MFS vs softupdates Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On a laptop with 64 megs of RAM, what makes more sense for performance improvements: softupdates or linking swap to a MFS ramdisk? -jm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message