Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:08:19 +0000 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pawe=B3_P=EAkala?= <c0rn@o2.pl>, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>, wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Updating Claws-Mail Message-ID: <20101216050819.GC15027@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20101213170628.0000695f@unknown> References: <20101211070156.414b5760@seibercom.net> <AANLkTikmh9XaQPxYnG8hGw9jX-3tOx0e_LYhef3pHEAD@mail.gmail.com> <20101211212624.0000067c@unknown> <20101212215431.2b2948ba@o2.pl> <20101212232351.70e145a7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20101213103125.00002af7@unknown> <20101213151239.79528759@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20101213170628.0000695f@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:06:28PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > What's wrong with having it build on the pointyhat cluster for those > which build a package and to make it an option for those which build > the port? Surely we want the pointyhat package to be the same as the default package that the port itself would build? mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101216050819.GC15027>