Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 01:23:03 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu> Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, imp@village.org, m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Niklas Hallqvist: archivers/hpack.non-usa.only Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970110012023.490B-100000@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199701092152.NAA23570@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > * So, my proprosal is for each of us to add __44bsd__ to our list of > > > * predefined macros. > > > > > > I have no problem with that. In fact, if we are going to do this we > > > > The most difficult problem is to determine what __44bsd__ macro covers. > > Is it will be frozen list of features? Or __44bsd__ will reflect some > > version/date which synchronizes through all *BSDs? Looks unreal. > > At a minimum, I want it to cover 4.4Lite. At least at the point that we all > roughly divurged. Beyond that, we should be using __FreeBSD__. What 4.4Lite you mean? FreeBSD is currecntly mix with 4.4Lite and 4.4Lite-2 which are _different_. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970110012023.490B-100000>