From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 12:10:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3189216A51E for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from slimak.dkm.cz (slimak.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF69843D8A for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: (qmail 35434 invoked by uid 0); 26 Sep 2006 12:10:10 -0000 Received: from grimm.quip.cz (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (213.220.192.218) by slimak.dkm.cz with SMTP; 26 Sep 2006 12:10:10 -0000 Message-ID: <451918A1.2080203@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:10:09 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pete French References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a kernel with config ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:10:30 -0000 Pete French wrote: >>On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:34:42 -0700, "Kevin Oberman" wrote: >> >>2. Building a kernel with config is not officially supported. It's at >> your risk and may not work in all cases. Build a kernel with: >> cd /usr/src >> make buildkernel > > > I was not aware that you wern't supposed to use config anymore - and I > am not convinced that the suggested alternative is actually a replacement > as I thought that buildkernel required you to have built the world first ? > Is this no longer true ? If it *is* true thhen what is the alternative to > using 'config' which should be used if you are on a system where you do > not have the time or the disc space to rebuild the world and simply want > to recompile the kernel ? AFAIK you can use make buildkernel && make installkernel without recompiling whole world if you have system built from same sources. Miroslav Lachman