From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 10:47:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D54637B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF1543F3F; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:47:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (acs-24-154-229-196.zoominternet.net [24.154.229.196]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h48HlNZK059337; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:47:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:44:07 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20030508134407.638ff0c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PR: docs/37221 && docs/51886: mount_nfs(8) options. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 17:47:26 -0000 Josh, Lars, After looking over this a little closer, I'm totally lost at why these PRs were filed. -p is listed in the manual page as a historic and deprecated option. -P is listed in the manual page as obsolete. I can understand removing them both from the usage message, however they seem to be documented fine in the manual page (as obsolete). Currently I have an email in to murray and bmah about this, and my personal opinion is that the manual page is fine. Any opinions on just removing the -P and -p option from the code and leaving the manual page as is? What do the other -doc committers think about this? -- Tom Rhodes