From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 29 12:09:17 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1E21065674;
	Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:09:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E46B8FC21;
	Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:09:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <488F086A.2060208@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:09:14 +0200
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mars G Miro <spry@anarchy.in.the.ph>
References: <f12f408a0807290221r339ae259j81b554b25ccd6431@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f12f408a0807290221r339ae259j81b554b25ccd6431@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-sun4v@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sun4v on recent CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:09:17 -0000

Mars G Miro wrote:
> Hiya
> 
>   I've just successfully updated my SUN T2000 from 20061115 to CURRENT
> csup'ed around July 15. It took a gruelling 8 hours, as any -jN
> somehow breaks. But that's ok, as prolly the recent CURRENT may have
> some improvements. I wanted to see how fast a buildkernel takes but
> then I get this:

>   Is there anyway not to build aic7xxx for sun4v?

I don't think that is the right question; those are valid cc1 options. 
No-one has worked on sun4v for a long time and there are still the same 
critical pmap bugs.  Sorry.

Kris