From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 11:38:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA00125 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:38:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA00104 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:38:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA192058793; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:46:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:46:33 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Derek Jewett Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static natd In-Reply-To: <000c01be3e5c$c3671a60$0afea8c0@ws2600> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Derek Jewett wrote: > Well unlike yourself I was just trying to be helpfull, to people in need of > the ISO images - if you have a better idea, hey why not post it here...? > >...which is a write-only directory. > > > >If wcarchive wanted their bandwidth to be consumed in one swoop, the ISO's > >would have remained there. Don't be a dumbshit, distributing ISOs was killing wcarchive's bandwidth. The incoming/ dir IS write-only, so you wasted your time. If we wanted ISO's to be there, they'd be there. A better idea? How about YOU provide a server that people can download ISOs off of. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message