From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 4 1:56:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE0E15138 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 1999 01:56:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA59282; Fri, 4 Jun 1999 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Brian Somers Cc: Matthew Dillon , dyson@iquest.net, ahasty@mindspring.com (Amancio Hasty), crossd@cs.rpi.edu (David E. Cross), freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, schimken@cs.rpi.edu Subject: Re: 3.2-stable, panic #12 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Jun 1999 09:13:30 BST." <199906040813.JAA00510@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 01:54:44 -0700 Message-ID: <59278.928486484@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'm sure that the fact that -release ended up with such obvious > instabilities was out of your control (IMHO RELENG_3 shouldn't have > been dubbed -stable 'till 3.2 was tagged), but I'd bet that this did Just a side comment on this - there was tremendous flammage that the RELENG_3 branch wasn't created with 3.0 and when 3.1 came out, the most frequently asked question I got was "when are you going to fucking branch already?" My point is that you very definitely cannot please everyone all of the time. Do it quick and some will scream. Do it slow and others will scream. Either way, you're getting screamed at. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message