Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:39:17 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@FreeBSD.org>, ruby@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [rubygems-]: Request for Review and -exp Run Message-ID: <20090409023917.223c7d1e.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49DD2449.4080509@p6m7g8.com> References: <49DCCC93.2010209@p6m7g8.com> <1239216349.50237.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <49DCF1F2.3040501@p6m7g8.com> <20090409002918.e48eecde.stas@FreeBSD.org> <49DD2449.4080509@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:25:13 -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> mentioned: > Stanislav Sedov wrote: > > I don't think Exprun is really required. We can run this on tinderbox - ruby > > ports builds pretty fast. The change seems to be straightforward and limited > > to the affected ports only. > I've already run it on a tinderbox at $work (RideCharge Inc) > > unfortunately its not public. > Then it should be safe to commit if the run was successfull. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE !DSPAM:49dd2794967001216313571!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090409023917.223c7d1e.stas>