From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jan 26 15:23:16 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2C737B401; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:23:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca (spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6E043F18; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:23:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca) Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (passer.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.110.29]) by spqr.osg.gov.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B589EF1A; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:23:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys.cwsent.com (cwsys2 [10.1.2.1]) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.12.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h0QNN891051252; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:23:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cy@cwsent.com) Received: from cwsys (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.12.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h0QNN7E8055560; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:23:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cy@cwsys.cwsent.com) Message-Id: <200301262323.h0QNN7E8055560@cwsys.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com To: Dmitriy Shnayder Cc: cy@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: screen-3.9.13 In-Reply-To: Message from Dmitriy Shnayder of "Sun, 26 Jan 2003 16:48:42 EST." <3E3457BA.4030207@cs.rit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:23:07 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <3E3457BA.4030207@cs.rit.edu>, Dmitriy Shnayder writes: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I am using the "screen" port, version 3.9.13, and it is doing something unusu > al > that you perhaps could explain. It functions normally as far as creating, usi > ng, > and killing screens is concerned. However, I recently noticed that while the > processes under screen do not take up much CPU power (less than 1% when idlin > g, > not much more when active), the main "screen" process takes up about 95% of t > he > CPU power on my computer. Actually, as I have observed using the "screen top" > command, it first uses less than 10% of the processor, then 10%, then 20%, th > en > more and more until about 95% of the processor is tied up by the "screen" > process. What could cause it to behave this way? Also, could rebuilding the > port, as someone suggested to me on an IRC channel, help this problem? Rebuilding the port locally does fix the problem. I've been trying to recreate the problem locally, however I've been unable to do so. The binary package is built on a "pristine" system in the bento cluster, I'm reconfiguring my testbed, P120, currently running -CURRENT, as a "pristine" environment in order to recreate the problem. In the mean time build the port rather than installing the binary package. -- Cheers, Phone: 250-387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: 250-387-5231 Team Leader, Solaris Team Email: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, CITS Ministry of Management Services Province of BC FreeBSD UNIX: cy@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message