Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:42:27 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Paul Schenkeveld <freebsd@psconsult.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: UFS1 vs UFS2
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212302041380.4966@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20121230193926.GA37126@psconsult.nl>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20121230193926.GA37126@psconsult.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It makes perfect sense to use UFS1 on systems where space savings matter
> unless your application requires any of the new features that are not
> present in UFS1.
>
> Nanobsd(8) for example uses UFS1 by default too.
thank you for answering. i don't need any new extra features, just plain 
filesystem on 60GB filesystem. But question is - will performance be the 
same, slower or faster?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1212302041380.4966>