From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 23 13:47:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA29582 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 13:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Sisyphos.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (Sisyphos.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.212.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA29540; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 13:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x14.mi.uni-koeln.de (annexr3-1.slip.Uni-Koeln.DE) by Sisyphos.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE with SMTP id AA26631 (5.67b/IDA-1.5); Mon, 23 Jun 1997 22:46:43 +0200 Received: (from se@localhost) by x14.mi.uni-koeln.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id WAA06221; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 22:46:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: " Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 22:46:39 +0200 From: Stefan Esser To: Joerg Wunsch Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Stefan Esser Subject: Re: pci_map_mem failed... References: <199706201726.MAA15908@friley01.res.iastate.edu> <19970621160401.FP36358@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.74 In-Reply-To: <19970621160401.FP36358@uriah.heep.sax.de>; from J Wunsch on Sat, Jun 21, 1997 at 04:04:01PM +0200 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Jun 21, J Wunsch wrote: > As Chris Csanady wrote: > > > There seems to be some comment in German in pci.c about > > this case, so I was wondering if something is broken.. > > /* ACHTUNG: Ist der Code richtig, wenn eine PCI-PCI-Bridge fuer > * die PCI-Slots verwendet wird, aber die Onboard-Devices direkt > * an der CPU-PCI-Bridge haengen (Siehe Compaq Prolinea Problem) ??? > */ > > /* > * Attention: is this code indeed correct when using a PCI-to-PCI > * bridge for the PCI slots, where the onboard devices connect > * directly to the CPU-PCI bridge (see Compaq Prolinea problem)? > */ > > Somebody feel free to commit the translation. No, please don't ! I'll remove it next time I log in on Freefall to do some commits, since it got no meaning anymore ... Regards, STefan