From owner-freebsd-mobile  Sun Jul  2 17:38:36 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134EE37BD7F
	for <freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun,  2 Jul 2000 17:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@yogotech.com)
Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131])
	by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22327
	for <freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 18:38:04 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com)
Received: (from nate@localhost)
	by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA02515;
	Sun, 2 Jul 2000 18:37:01 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from nate)
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 18:37:01 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200007030037.SAA02515@nomad.yogotech.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Mike <mike@adept.org>
Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 3C589C PCMCIA
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007021439360.50397-100000@snafu.adept.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007021439360.50397-100000@snafu.adept.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> In the past I've ran laptops with 3COM '589D' cards, should a 589C work as
> well?

Yes, as well as a 3C589B, and a 3c589 (no model #) too. :)


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message