From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jul 25 12:22:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84DB37B400 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:22:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1135E43E31 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:22:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) id g6PJMKpL049284; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:22:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:22:19 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Eric Dedrick Cc: Jud , adam@vectors.cx, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux compatability broken Message-ID: <20020725192219.GC62267@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1027622522.65b8affcjud@myrealbox.com> <20020725141428.P304-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020725141428.P304-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Jul 25), Eric Dedrick said: > > Just to clarify, I mean that using portupgrade will (hopefully, and > > in my experience, almost always) take care of your dependencies > > during the upgrade process, thus saving you from the IMO less > > preferable alternative of running more than one version of a port. > > > > Have you tried portupgrade with linux_base (after a backup of the > > old linux_base port skeleton and installation of the new one) to > > see whether Maple is happy? > > Yup. portupgrading eliminates ld-linux.so.1, required by maple. > Thanks for the suggestion, though. Hm. It shouldn't, since linux_base and linux_base-6 are different ports. Unless you had the RH6 version of linux_base, then installed linux_base-6, then upgraded linux_base to the RH7 version. The upgrade of linux_base would have effectively wiped out the linux_base-6 install. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message