From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 17 22:48:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B0B37B401 for ; Sat, 17 May 2003 22:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop016.verizon.net (pop016pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A4C43F85 for ; Sat, 17 May 2003 22:48:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ej.cerejo@laposte.net) Received: from laposte.net ([68.160.113.35]) by pop016.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030518054828.LRVQ3199.pop016.verizon.net@laposte.net>; Sun, 18 May 2003 00:48:28 -0500 Message-ID: <3EC71EA9.2000005@laposte.net> Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 01:48:25 -0400 From: "E. J. Cerejo" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Perry References: <3EC6E66B.8050203@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop016.verizon.net from [68.160.113.35] at Sun, 18 May 2003 00:48:27 -0500 cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Portupgrade Update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 05:48:30 -0000 It take a little bit more to upgrade your installed ports than just use portupgrade! Most probably you started using portupgrade without doing pkgdb -F first and portsdb -Uu. You should uninstall every port that has double versions installed, uninstall both of them and then follow the instructions on this site to upgrade and reinstall the ports: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/11/29/Big_Scary_Daemons.html Bob Perry wrote: > I ran pkg_info after upgrading the ports tree and found two versions of > the same package, imake-4.2.0_1 and imake-4.3.0. I was about to > deinstall the earlier version but first wanted to check the package > requirements with the pkg_info -rR command. The ouput indicated that > imake-4.2.0_1 was required by 95 packages in my system. Twenty-one of > these packages also appeared in output I received after running the same > command on imake-4.3.0. My packages were over 90% current. I expected > to see only one package requiring the older version. Can anyone help me > make sense of this? > > Thanks, > Bob > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >