From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul  6 06:34:41 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211E837B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Jul 2003 06:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94EB44015
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Jul 2003 06:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mux@freebsd.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920)
	id 9CC1F2ED43D; Sun,  6 Jul 2003 06:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 15:34:40 +0200
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
To: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <20030706133440.GS42121@elvis.mu.org>
References: <20030704001335.GM42121@elvis.mu.org>
	<20030705132505.GA11334@freebie.xs4all.nl>
	<20030705140726.GR42121@elvis.mu.org>
	<20030706102606.GA15384@freebie.xs4all.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030706102606.GA15384@freebie.xs4all.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Call for testers: patch to convert dc(4) to busdma
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 13:34:41 -0000

Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 04:07:26PM +0200, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > 
> > > Could it be there is something fishy with mbuf handling?
> > 
> > Could you please try the attached patch?  It's absolutely untested
> > except for compilation because I have to leave right now, but I believe
> > it should fix the mbuf leaks you've been reporting.
> 
> I ran netperf and bonnie via nfs in both directions. Everything ran fine,
> no mbuf issues or whatever.

Cool!

> Anything specific you want tested in addition?

No, I've got everything I need, thanks a bunch.  I'll probably commit
this patch later tonight since I received successful reports on x86,
alpha and ia64, modulo this mbuf leak that is now fixed.

Thanks to everyone who tested this patch, it's very much appreciated.

Maxime