From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 5 14:37:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681F516A420; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:37:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from eddie.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC4043D48; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:37:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eddie.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD23119C4C; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:37:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id A6E4811928; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:37:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:37:20 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: delphij@delphij.net Message-ID: <20060205143719.GB857@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Code policy on doc/ tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:37:24 -0000 --R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2006.01.29 01:09:28 +0800, Xin LI wrote: > In order to be able to generate usable PDF and RTF files for the > FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project, we have added several building > hooks into our local tree, which is available at: >=20 > http://cvsweb.freebsd.org.cn/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/share/mk/Attic/?only_with_t= ag=3DCNPROJ >=20 > Is code allowed here? Should we make it as a port? Hey, I think it would be a good idea to have it in the main repository so the complete doc build (including the build that generates document for ftp.freebsd.org) can use it. If it should be a port or directly in doc/ really depend on if you think it would be useful for people in general use and not just doc/, and if the files are used directly by TeX or need to be compiled as a normal program. If general purpose or need to be compiled I think a port would be preferable, and then just make it a dependency of the docproj port. Anyway, that's my 0.01$CURRENCY. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD5g2fh9pcDSc1mlERAkhlAJ4vgs9K4mbT3MwZ5/pPIhBaMheQXgCbByqm hA0z7uZU5+RSjQu1Bsdm1Ww= =Fwck -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk--