From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 09:36:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12ADE16A4CE for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:36:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (pimout1-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C6543D55 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:36:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from maul.immure.com (adsl-66-136-206-1.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [66.136.206.1])i15Ha0fD071690; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:36:00 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by maul.immure.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i15HZxPg039124; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:35:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from luke.immure.com (luke.immure.com [10.1.132.3]) by maul.immure.com (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i15HZw3s039099; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:35:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from luke.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by luke.immure.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i15HZwo5083025; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:35:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@luke.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by luke.immure.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i15HZr60083017; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:35:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:35:53 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: James Van Artsdalen Message-ID: <20040205173553.GA37589@luke.immure.com> References: <4020B672.9080304@it.su.se> <200402041251.50129.adridg@cs.kun.nl> <200402041207.i14C7JGW008982@bigtex.jrv.org> <200402042130.i14LUBwd029592@bigtex.jrv.org> <20040205134551.GB88274@luke.immure.com> <200402051627.i15GRLtx087501@bigtex.jrv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402051627.i15GRLtx087501@bigtex.jrv.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-scanner: scanned by Inflex 1.0.12.3 on maul.immure.com cc: jj@it.su.se cc: adridg@cs.kun.nl cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shaky support or my system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bob Willcox List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:36:10 -0000 On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 10:27:21AM -0600, James Van Artsdalen wrote: > > Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:45:51 -0600 > > From: Bob Willcox > > > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:30:11PM -0600, James Van Artsdalen wrote: > > > Unfortunately it appears my case was a false alarm. > > > My Tyan K8W S2885 is not stable unless ECC is turned off in ROM setup. > > > > Could you guys post what kind of memory (brand and part no. if possible) > > you are using? > > I'm using 8x Crucial part #CT12872Y335 with Opteron 2x 244. > > There's no way to tell if this is a problem with the RAM or not. > My gut suspicion is a BIOS bug, but it could well be the motherboard. > There's really no evidence it's problem with the DIMMs. > > (the system is not reporting a memory error. It's incredibly unlikely > any sort of problem in the DDIM would fail to show up at some point as > an ECC error, and ECC errors are not being reported by the system. > The symptom is that FreeBSD gets the wrong data back from a read and > no ECC error) Well, my early Tyan Athlon MBs (Tiger S2460) didn't like Crucial DIMMs much, and my later Tyan boards (Tiger s2466's) won't work with the Crucial DIMMs at all (I have about 8 of them on a shelf that I can't use at all now). I never have seen any ECC errors (there registered ECC DIMMs) with these, just varying degrees of system unstability (random memory erors/panics). A couple of years ago I spent quite a bit of time on the phone with Crucial's tech support folks (shortly after I bought the memory) with no real resolution (the tech support guy tried to be helpful but couldn't really help). Following this experience, I have come to worry much more than I previously did about memory compatibility issues; and I began to wonder just how much good ECC memory really does in these systems when you wind up with all kinds of system instability. I now worry more about compatibility than do ECC vs. non-ECC memory. Note, that my newer Tyan dual MB systems (those with the S2466 MBs that can run with unbufferred/non-ECC DIMMs) have been running with unbufferred/non-ECC DIMMs for some time (over a year) and I have had much better stability with these systems than when I tried the Crucial reg/ECC DIMMs (generally, they either wouldn't boot at all or only ran for a short time, depending on how many DIMMs I installed--more meant shorter time to crash). Note that I never did try other brands of reg/ECC memory on these systems since they were stable with the cheaper stuff and I was growing tired of spending money on them. Bob -- Bob Willcox If facts do not conform to the theory, bob@immure.com they must be disposed of. Austin, TX