From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 14 14:13:42 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02BA37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 14:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobile.hub.org (u173n136.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.136])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2633843FA3
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 14:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: by mobile.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 604811E3; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:13:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mobile.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 028171A8; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:13:54 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:13:54 +0000 (GMT)
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030414170306.C70262@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
Message-ID: <20030414211310.I5215@hub.org>
References: <20030414192627.C32D543F3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
 <20030414170306.C70262@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: pawel.worach@telia.com
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:13:42 -0000

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:

> Pawel,
>
> Last I've heard, SCHED_ULE isn't SMP friendly.

I'm running SCHED_ULE on a DualAMD desktop at the office, and haven't
noticed any instability issues ...