Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:26:37 -0700 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program Message-ID: <20121026182637.5378058094@chaos.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <20121026175559.GA44331@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <CAGH67wRkOmy7rWLkxXnT2155PuSQpwOMyu7dTAKeO1WW2dju7g@mail.gmail.com> <201210020750.23358.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAGH67wTM1VDrpu7rS=VE1G_kVEOHhS4-OCy5FX_6eDGmiNTA8A@mail.gmail.com> <201210021037.27762.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAGH67wQffjVHqFw_eN=mfeg-Ac2Z6XBT5Hv72ev0kjjx7YH7SA@mail.gmail.com> <127FA63D-8EEE-4616-AE1E-C39469DDCC6A@xcllnt.net> <20121025211522.GA32636@dragon.NUXI.org> <3F52B7C9-A7B7-4E0E-87D0-1E67FE5D0BA7@xcllnt.net> <20121026175559.GA44331@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:55:59 -0700, "David O'Brien" writes: >I'm trying to create an ATF test for filemon, but I don't want to have to >build make back and forth when I want to build a port. >Likely that doesn't put me in the "people working on ATF" in your book. >What can I and others do to work on this? I'm not on Portmgr and most >aren't either. Why not simply install bmake as bmake? You can even use devel/bmake in ports. >I disagree. Before sending my mail, I ran this by sjg and his response >was: "I have absolutely no objection". I have no objection to bmake being installed as bmake.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121026182637.5378058094>