From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 21 8: 0:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4EF37B404 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:00:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id E68FC532C; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:00:04 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: mark@grondar.za, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review References: <20020121142038.GA36519@nagual.pp.ru> <20020121155316.GD37234@nagual.pp.ru> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Jan 2002 17:00:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20020121155316.GD37234@nagual.pp.ru> Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > I already comment "always turning opie on" in previous message, besides > that I don't understand one thing in your patch: why you not enable > pam_opie for "su" and not add pam_opieaccess there? It is enough useful > for sysadmin logging in as user via unencrypted telnet and then do "su" > for root. Hmm? Simple oversight, sorry. I'll post a new patch when I've fixed the "no_fake_prompts" thingy. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message