From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Sep 14 7:34: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4200114C4C for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:33:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA22237; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:33:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Cliff Crawford Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Phil Regnauld , gmarco@scotty.masternet.it, "Jordan K. Hubbard" , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re: freebsdcon and Radisson Hotel Reservation. References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 14 Sep 1999 16:33:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: Cliff Crawford's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 1999 10:10:52 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Cliff Crawford writes: > On 14 Sep 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > | Cliff Crawford writes: > | > Here's a perfect example of why it's BAD to not have reply-to headers > | > on a mailing list. > | Look again. The FreeBSD mailing lists don't set Reply-To. > Yeah, that's what I just said. Foo! I didn't see the "not". "Reply-To" in connection with mailing lists has been discussed to death in various fora. It's a semi-religious issue, though it is my impression that most people who have actual experience managing mailing lists ("actual experience" as opposed to "strong opinions based on what one thinks managing a large mailing list may be like") are against it. That includes me. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message