Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Oct 1997 15:20:55 -0700
From:      Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com>
To:        "Todd \"Taco\" Hansen" <taco@mad.scientist.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed.
Message-ID:  <199710132220.PAA18455@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
In-Reply-To: "Todd \"Taco\" Hansen" <taco@mad.scientist.com> "Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed." (Oct 12,  7:39pm)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 12,  7:39pm, "Todd \"Taco\" Hansen" wrote:
} Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed.
} I am more of a programmer than anything else, but occasionally I have to
} do system admin stuff on various FreeBSd boxes. Even some that I have
} never seen before. I find the disabled, not probed messages very useful.
} They are usually not very long and it makes it very convienent to be
} looking for a problem and to just view dmesg and look to make sure the
} device was detected. If it says disabled, not probed, then you know
} quick and easy what is up.

By that logic, the kernel should also print messages for all drivers
that were removed from the kernel configuration file.

Why isn't the the kernel finding my IDE disks?  Oh
"wdc0: not compiled into this kernel" ;-)


			---  Truck



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710132220.PAA18455>