From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Dec 12 9:32:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D734137B41B for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:32:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBCHWs545798 for doc@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:32:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:32:54 -0500 From: Michael Lucas To: doc@freebsd.org Subject: elderly anchors Message-ID: <20011212123254.A45773@blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At one point, we used anchor to point to particular sections in the FAQ. Then some selfless non-committer put in a couple of PRs to add question id= tags to each and every question in the blasted thing. In quite a few (not all!) cases, it appears that the anchor tags are moot with that addition. Will a dangerously dedicated disk endanger my health? T Am I missing something, or should such tags go away? ==ml -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org My FreeBSD column: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message