From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 28 18:55:24 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 75A4E16A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:55:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from odot.okladot.state.ok.us (odot.okladot.state.ok.us
	[192.149.244.9])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7F5FC43D53; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:55:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from root@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us)
Received: from notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us
	[10.36.36.31])NAA95532;	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:55:21 -0500
Received: from isdmon2.okladot.state.ok.us ([192.149.244.24])
          by notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.1)
          with ESMTP id 2004092813560669-70939 ;
          Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:56:06 -0500 
Received: from techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us (techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us
	[199.27.9.37])i8SIt2mK081220;	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:55:02 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from root@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us)
Received: by techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us (Postfix, from userid 0)
	id 4AAD45C29; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:54:53 -0500 (CDT)
To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Paul Seniura" <pdseniura@techie.com>
Errors-To: "Paul Seniura" <pdseniura@techie.com>
Sender: "Paul Seniura" <pdseniura@techie.com>
In-Reply-To: <200409260202.i8Q22OIo060930@repoman.freebsd.org>
References: <200409260202.i8Q22OIo060930@repoman.freebsd.org>
Message-Id: <20040928185453.4AAD45C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:54:53 -0500 (CDT)
X-ODOT-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the Help Desk for more
	information
X-ODOT-MailScanner: This E-mail appears not to contain malware.
X-ODOT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted),
	SpamAssassin (score=-9.7, required 5, BAYES_01 -6.60,
	IN_REP_TO -3.20, RCVD_IN_ORBS 0.12)
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Notes9c/ODOT(Release 6.5.1|January 21,
	2004) at 09/28/2004 01:56:06 PM,at 09/28/2004 01:56:07 PM,
	Serialize complete at 09/28/2004 01:56:07 PM
cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: re: cvs commit: ports/math/pari-devel Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Paul Seniura <pdseniura@techie.com>
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:55:24 -0000


Hi,

> kris        2004-09-26 02:02:24 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD ports repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     math/pari-devel      Makefile
>   Log:
>   BROKEN on 5.x: Does not compile
> 
>   Approved by:    portmgr (self)
> 
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.7       +4 -0      ports/math/pari-devel/Makefile

I've filed a possible workaround patch for this
compile problem about 12 days ago in PR ports/71803 
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=71803> . 
I included a URL where this known bug is discussed
at the project's official maillist archives. 
The PR has yet to be assigned, tho. 
My CC of the PR sent to the maintainer has bounced
due to the (political) firewall here at work; I'm
not sure what else I can do to reach them.

The non-devel version of math/pari e.g.

> kris        2004-09-26 02:01:51 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD ports repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     math/pari            Makefile
>   Log:
>   BROKEN on 5.x: Does not compile
> 
>   Approved by:    portmgr (self)
> 
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.32      +4 -0      ports/math/pari/Makefile

seems to be suffering from the same problem, if
someone can see how to fit the workaround patch
in 71803 onto it (these two ports actually do
conflict with each other, so I have not looked
at the non-devel version).

  --  thx, Paul Seniura.