From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon May 11 23:41:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956462DB004 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@sdf.org) Received: from mx.sdf.org (mx.sdf.org [205.166.94.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Lcry2Sf7z4PZ4 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 23:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@sdf.org) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@miku.sdf.org [205.166.94.6]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 04BNfJqF005542 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 11 May 2020 23:41:19 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 04BNfJVU011448; Mon, 11 May 2020 18:41:19 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <202005112341.04BNfJVU011448@sdf.org> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 18:41:19 -0500 To: linimon@lonesome.com Subject: Re: releng/11.4 branch, 11.4-BETA1 builds and 11.4-RELEASE schedule reminder Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: <20200508001129.GZ9584@FreeBSD.org> <20200511073405.GA47112@FreeBSD.org> <20200511133440.GF29030@FreeBSD.org> <20200511143350.GA72941@FreeBSD.org> <202005111941.04BJfvSf021382@sdf.org> <20200511221425.GA17330@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20200511221425.GA17330@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Lcry2Sf7z4PZ4 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bennett@sdf.org designates 205.166.94.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bennett@sdf.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sdf.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[20.94.166.205.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; IP_SCORE(-0.28)[ip: (-0.85), ipnet: 205.166.94.0/24(-0.42), asn: 14361(-0.06), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14361, ipnet:205.166.94.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 23:41:23 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 02:41:57PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: > > Another poster offered to file PRs for me in the interim, and I sent > > him a description of the x11 problems, but I didn't hear back from him. > > Probably me. I stay pretty busy. > > Do you still need me to do this? > AFAIK, yes. I don't dare run xorg until those two problems have been fixed at the very least. As for the kernel bugs, once the graphics problems have been fixed, I should be able to post the rest of the PRs myself. However, 11.4 is going to be released soon, and those need to be fixed if 11.4 will return the stable/11 branch to production quality. If they aren't, then I stand by my earlier statement that 11.1 was the last production-quality release of 11. IOW, because I anticipate a delay until the graphics problems have been fixed, someone ought to post PRs for the kernel bugs in time for them to be fixed before 11.4 is released. Do you still have what I sent? Is there more info that you need? Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * **********************************************************************