From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 16:02:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8E016A4CE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:02:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BCA43D4C for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:02:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731F6981B2; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:02:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fj@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i8DG2Oj05042; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:02:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:02:24 -0400 From: Joe Altman To: Joshua Tinnin Message-ID: <20040913160224.GA4899@panix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman , Joshua Tinnin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5878D00B313A8D4E8D00B7E3082FC693067A1B@FF01.marsik.org> <413CA85B.9080500@makeworld.com> <200409122316.51822.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409122316.51822.krinklyfig@spymac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Post Install Configuration Issues (ruby18 error) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:02:25 -0000 On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 11:16:51PM -0700, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > On Monday 06 September 2004 11:11 am, Chris > wrote: > > > Another way: - this changes the default database (btriev) to hash > > > > setenv PORTS_DBDRIVER bdb1_hash > > > > then run your portdb -u > > In fact, I opted for this one. I now run my ports tree updating > > scripts as I did BEFORE these issues. > > What sort of effect might this have elsewhere? I'm sure this fix works, > but is there something else that could get borked by changing the > default database? I used this on a box w/ multiple failures of ruby; I have since noticed no issues. The only difference is that I used this: ENV['PORTS_DBDRIVER'] = 'dbm_hash' from: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=638936+0+current/freebsd-ports -- One million points of light shining on the new world-order model for fascism and tyranny. Get in line.