From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Dec 16 10:35: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1668137B416 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 10:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from contactdish ([10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id fBGIWCR12997; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:32:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <000401c1865f$fac145f0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "Terry Lambert" Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" , "David Greenman" , "Greg Lehey" , "FreeBSD Chat" References: <20011216044542.Y86103-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> <004401c18635$2bd802d0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C1CAAEC.636A8975@mindspring.com> <005b01c1863f$3fa9aa70$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C1CC27C.FAF0A04F@mindspring.com> <007601c18652$f4d62640$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C1CE49E.39FBBED2@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Why no Indians and Arabs? Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:32:11 +0100 Organization: Anthony's Home Page (development site) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Terry writes: > Unbalanced tags (e.g open table element with > no close tag). There shouldn't be any pages on the site with open tables. Can you provide a URL? > Automatic tag balancing being implied by the > browser for all tags is an SGML feature; the > HTML tag implied balancing is not true for all > tags, according to the specification, amking > the behaviour "undefined", rather thna "standard". Most of the pages validate correctly when I test them with the W3C's validator; therefore they are _standard_. > I'd be happy to install IE for FreeBSD, if it > weren't for the monopolistic practices which > have precluded it from being ported. I would > even run it under Linux emulation, if need be. As I've already indicated, that is your problem, not mine. > [ ... comments on the marginal utility of UNIX > desktops ... ] > > Which begs the question of why you post to these > lists, which are not specifically intended for > Windows advocacy... Because I consider UNIX to be useful as a server. I don't see any place for UNIX on the desktop, except as a geek curosity, and so I don't worry about that; but its utility as a server is well established, and that is what interests me. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message