From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 20 2: 2: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mrelay.jrc.it (mrelay.jrc.it [139.191.1.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0732B14F44 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 02:01:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nick.hibma@jrc.it) Received: from elpc36.jrc.it (elpc36.jrc.it [139.191.71.36]) by mrelay.jrc.it (LMC5692) with SMTP id LAA23460; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 11:02:55 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 10:59:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Nick Hibma X-Sender: n_hibma@elpc36.jrc.it Reply-To: Nick Hibma To: Greg Lehey , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Tomoaki NISHIYAMA , current@FreeBSD.ORG, y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp, imp@harmony.village.org, peter@netplex.com.au, julian@whistle.com Subject: Re: Peer review (was: HEADS UP!!!! Important instructions for -current users!) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > I think it's more than appropriate, it's *mandatory* if you wish to > > > solve the communication problem. Posting regular updates on your > > > progress on -hackers or -current (depending on applicability) is > > > strongly encouraged. > > > > But as we have seen, posting on -hackers doesn't guarantee that > > anybody of any importance will see it. > > Possibly -current is better for ongoing development reports. I read both > :-) Which means that someone will crosspost it if necessary... Post and forget. Nick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message