From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri Sep 6 10:36:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD81837B400 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:36:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0861843E6E for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:36:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA13438; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:36:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g86HZtX60122; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:35:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15736.59259.51892.798026@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:35:55 -0400 (EDT) To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mozilla failure on 4.6.2 In-Reply-To: <1031333130.342.46.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> References: <20020906040641.GA61111@xor.obsecurity.org> <1031287598.361.2.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.40749.986834.818558@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031329151.342.9.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.58229.652949.93794@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031333130.342.46.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Joe Marcus Clarke writes: > > Are you saying that there's something different about the calling > > conventions that would make using the linux code as it stands > > incorrect? > > I don't know. However, I am seeing core dumps on the port-build and > when executing mozilla that point to xptcall. Admittedly, I don't have > an Alpha to test with myself. Jan had been generous enough to allow me > to login to his. He is running 4.6.2, so I have not been able to test > -stable or -current. > > However, tests with gcc31 in ports, and with varying degrees of > optimizations have yielded no success on Alpha. > Do you know what, if any, differences there are between our g++ and the one linux uses? I'll be the first to admit that I don't know jack about g++/c++. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message