From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 29 14:16:13 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418C710656CC;
	Fri, 29 May 2009 14:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org)
Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es
	[85.48.194.97])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0378FC1A;
	Fri, 29 May 2009 14:16:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org)
Received: from beta.locolomo.org (beta.locolomo.org [172.16.0.32])
	by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D34251C0847;
	Fri, 29 May 2009 16:16:06 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4A1FEE26.9000700@locolomo.org>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:16:06 +0200
From: Erik Norgaard <norgaard@locolomo.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org
References: <4A1F95DE.9080501@locolomo.org>
	<4A1FDE51.5050604@FreeBSD.org>	<4A1FE330.4050105@locolomo.org>
	<4A1FE67F.8060506@FreeBSD.org> <4A1FE953.5010909@locolomo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A1FE953.5010909@locolomo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libapreq2 broken?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:16:13 -0000

Erik Norgaard wrote:
> Greg Larkin wrote:
> 
>> It seems to be a problem only when the "WITH_MODPERL2=yes" switch is
>> given to the port make process.  Has that been enabled on both of your
>> installations?
> 
> That works! it will build and install fine if I comment that from my 
> make.conf, I thought that this port was to work with mod_perl2!?

Too fast, without "WITH_MODPERL2=yes" build and installed yes, but 
didn't work, it appears that a large portion of the port was simply not 
built nor installed despite the lack of error.

See patch in other reply on this thread.

Erik
-- 
Erik Nørgaard
Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157                  http://www.locolomo.org