Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 19:42:25 -0500 From: Ade Lovett <ade@remarq.com> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gtk versions Message-ID: <19990420194225.E90842@remarq.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990420125336.16641A-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>; from Bill Fumerola on Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 12:54:32PM -0400 References: <19990420124051.B55954@area51.fremont.ca.us> <Pine.HPP.3.96.990420125336.16641A-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 12:54:32PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > Lots of ports only work with certain versions, though I've been heard > making threats to remove gtk10, gtk11-devel and BROKEN every port that > doesn't work with what's left. Do it. Please. Along with all the kde stuff (given that kde11) is there. IMHO, given that multiple instances of gtk/glib occasionally interact badly with ports and non-ports software, and that the 1.2.1 versions of both are relatively stable (for some weird definition of stable), it seems to make much more sense to temporarily lose a few ports in the interests of keep a system sane. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, RemarQ Communities, Inc., San Jose, CA. mailto:ade@remarq.com http://www.remarq.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990420194225.E90842>