Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:40:06 GMT From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/91962: [patch] Fix missing dependancy in www/cadaver Message-ID: <200601200240.k0K2e6bU047457@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/91962; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> Cc: FreeBSD Gnats Submit <freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports/91962: [patch] Fix missing dependancy in www/cadaver Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:30:30 +1100 On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:20:28PM -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote: > Which of the two would be appropriate? ports-bugs-followup it more appropriate. > In the meantime kris@ has marked the port as broken. (Yes, I've taken > took much time to deal with this) Should I modify the patch to > remove the BROKEN tag or is that worthy of a different PR? Thanks > for your patience and help, I'm slowly but surely getting up to speed > on this port maintainer thing. :) If you say that the file directory "en@quote" is correct then I'll submit the fixes, and remove the BROKEN line. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601200240.k0K2e6bU047457>