From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Mar 22 13:43:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352DDAD91B5 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C78A4C9C for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:43:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x230.google.com with SMTP id k12so162291909lbb.1 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 06:43:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=nh0jRjsTTTTVFJIM1o70GbCLV/Je4Hr4OOu47D10REg=; b=rv67RmPPoH5/m8LKxfswcBgL3IQYdq+LR/BMPZZnAWEekRkMMwkhw5IPGtwEPoT5vC khLe0FzI1BB4Uuv5XLoKlJdTPNyrp0JcJgQDWUCeT9tyx0ZStdlBWUtxv26JpSK2DTLP dqPpWkTCRFm1sYKya7xt8IQqPil8VX29S8xxXRZepceGQv35oMGaUB99NbWQVpvu52Aa +XcvDi/g619YNhobRNaxK3XVr8+Hkjzy+4EQw30TSEIovu6AZ/nj0v9WyMOVW9OkzPJe s97aQ/31Uha4Kc1A2RYZl5Rnq7GHMhi1jSyK675gVgjum4ZlbiK9nIR+o9oAZLNmc7KF qFDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=nh0jRjsTTTTVFJIM1o70GbCLV/Je4Hr4OOu47D10REg=; b=dx98qqUIOOQrc/aFUPBj8LfC/iW18LfbOHEcKb1UtwpsAxwxBKutjza0/Xt/MbEH3c qWZVMPCdsn0LS9zeFZcZfH0wqYBM2UX9WhqG8LNDEs5j4hgV+Q4F8uZf7uACqsziPidw iGOAlJGm+jdeDwPuWA3VhL8Bzgq5zDP/srI2pQEj86+DiaLYuleRoDJOJWF6K6xF4HHX Ng48utErCMS0diiWgX1aLu3Kr+XVG64my2ft/264sP99sBxck7S1i+x6h2Q/U44BfeAT g8lRSDmWFKImWGniS0nfspHnllww9l4cIUsLsrSEVjEcD/MjxP/bwZVBPLeGXIcIBQ56 L6ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIEfSGYx8/6f1d/9qcypFyaIdP6Ibi1+0PNh7d2qP0QuvcUSGcuq2de6Q/N5xZ0HZLGiJXzjV8yMFgS9g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.136.139 with SMTP id k133mr13174135lfd.157.1458654235978; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 06:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.44.68 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 06:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.44.68 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 06:43:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:43:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Taking bhyve step forward enterprise grade From: Sami Halabi To: John Nielsen Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:43:58 -0000 nsx introduces several featurs: 1. firewall builtin within vmware built upon rules eg: all guests having name comtaing windows cant access specific subnets, fast routing even if different subnets and recognized as 2 vms in the same esx. 2. plugin to 3rd party products as firewalls, antivirus and so on.. =D7=91=D7=AA=D7=90=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9A 19 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=A8=D7=A5 2016 17:55= ,=E2=80=8F "John Nielsen" =D7=9B=D7=AA=D7=91: > > On Mar 19, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Sami Halabi wrote: > > > > hi, > > are there ongoing job on taking bhyve further steps toward enterprise > scale > > like: > > 1. high availability, rules on vms (like affinity rules in vmware: eg a= n > > app vm and sql vm go together...), vmotion... > > 2. network virtualization like vmware nsx... > > The wiki pages probably the best place for general info on bhyve current > and planned features: https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve > > Live migration is a planned feature. HA rules and other automation and > orchestration are probably beyond the scope of what bhyve itself is aimin= g > to achieve, though such features could easily be provided by additional > scripts and tools. > > What specifically are you after in terms of network virtualization? Again= , > bhyve itself isn't intended to be a giant umbrella but FreeBSD does suppo= rt > many networking features which could support network virtualization (and > which work fine with bhyve). > > JN > >