From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 12:06:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B123D1065673 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:06:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@exonetric.com) Received: from relay0.exonetric.net (relay0.exonetric.net [178.250.72.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787B38FC24 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.20.10.3] (92.40.253.154.threembb.co.uk [92.40.253.154]) by relay0.exonetric.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1D55721F; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:35:56 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Mark Blackman In-Reply-To: <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:35:54 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <92468E79-ED9B-4C05-B891-875FA0B65C0E@exonetric.com> References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: Anton Shterenlikht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:06:24 -0000 On 28 Feb 2012, at 11:32, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > sorry to be a pain. > > Are we talking 10%, 50%, 90% complete? Depending on how you weight the various items of POSIX compliance, a finger-in-the-air guess would be around 90%, but I think only the -hackers list can give you a good answer. It's probably instructive to compare to various other OSes level of compliance as well (for your presentation). - Mark