From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Jan 13 09:30:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E8DA80DC4 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51451D35 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f206so287282952wmf.0 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:30:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardenedbsd-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AX+sLqlwyjkJ3KSzPz/QJYJQbUhNKIigHLdwNxMJdbQ=; b=TjBJXdBMN4W/krvG7WHvb1dxLH8dejxUnEmCLy8Gcvwp67qmR3KsHh949dmudH+jki fC2t1uTGySstVYiQYJx8bkWT/S4ZsSSpYTbfwVgej3JXFyKsV6IbL9jeR8b23cNPLChZ JgfYUT5sSnlnMEu+DuHyFMUyxvpnv6jvuTOvLvTAOc6wIdgzc6msH5FVLW7LtUO9VUF0 RMYMbtpmXtL76MKMbJ+39TXHHQOCxZ18FDcYhKBcjR7yavYShN8w3nQPcq3LY92P3ZG6 WUKXvpNCDmyLOtRRP3N3AgCgd7P0Hzul2AmZfabCwGgwsTqf4+qkmP3GQKWcNfAMyRR/ xV3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AX+sLqlwyjkJ3KSzPz/QJYJQbUhNKIigHLdwNxMJdbQ=; b=Jjjvq1/r6JtPfmPVgZhHOZWmLUejRIqTOFoVcxQA3JG9nBCobNqPx+3YY7e5ldDqj1 jh14iDDHXT+ta2fTdWFUHjYxBO28sOBXjWrwnYmYA3rbx+vvrIXs3ibn2UMPZvhsdvNt mssLgMUxJ/BeXkrFBOOixn1UbGuk2TgiTP4HO89mjkT8OkvMuXsglzfpNxzsQdVsKJJi 30w/UuzNsRC8VTBHQh2774RTo9fsf3xcP8NQS9dlf6Mxzk6riqTdDGjJO9zutdB4tciV ejZrlS7R4p9JZKKeHvUlR4fmpZFmHAwAauaw1BXX/GXBUyxK28Id2ohZuefpN31n7HFf KK8w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlPRH0q3/MOkbhkoej2Wqgbl7r5YHHon2NHdVVte53Dz6XnQVn3eWN/wDNYqBJxyj9eiMD+BLXWXFBkywMO/yTSFONYGfvDPe0P8r5sqmr5sfWcZdg= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.146.145 with SMTP id u139mr23657882wmd.81.1452677421116; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:30:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.85.167 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:30:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160113091730.381f94e94fa5cb2b90960111@neosystem.cz> References: <20151216170418.3c2ec09dfb87e9d09a026efd@neosystem.cz> <20160113091730.381f94e94fa5cb2b90960111@neosystem.cz> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:30:21 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: stf(4) on 10-stable From: Oliver Pinter To: Daniel Bilik Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, hrs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:30:23 -0000 Added hrs@ to CC. On 1/13/16, Daniel Bilik wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:04:18 +0100 > Daniel Bilik wrote: > >> A week ago I upgraded two systems where stf(4) is used. They were running >> 10-stable from beginning of September, with stf working fine. After >> upgrade, the address on stf0 stays "tentative" indefinitely. > > I've finally got some time to analyze this more thoroughly. And indeed, > the problem was introduced with both r287734 (changes to in6if_do_dad() in > sys/netinet6/in6.c) and r290348 (changes to nd6_timer() in > sys/netinet6/nd6.c), specifically in combination with stf(4) interfaces not > being > marked "running". Attached patch fixes that. Should I create PR for this? > > -- > Dan >