Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:45:10 +0200 From: Alarig Le Lay <alarig@swordarmor.fr> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot add an ipv6 route with -interface Message-ID: <20151023084510.GC22065@drscott.swordarmor.fr> In-Reply-To: <20151023.090553.1908755081181502110.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <20151022230838.GA22065@drscott.swordarmor.fr> <20151023.090553.1908755081181502110.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri Oct 23 09:05:53 2015, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Is 2a00:5884::1/64 configured on em1? An address within > 2a00:5884:8200::/40 is required on em1 in this case. em1 is configured with 2a00:5884::1/36 (which does not contain 2a00:5884:8200::/40), but physically this two networks are at the same place (i.e. in the same vlan on the same switch) so I don’t understand why I need to take an address from 2a00:5884:8200::/40. -- Alarig Le Lay [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWKfOWAAoJEK84SsFrICuIUqAIAKUm8LMgHHoi20AxihCXN6kJ LBBq+s64zMpaQhhYyeqVgD5hrvvv67vGCSa827u3U2ft2OmcQdBqDoIXtRyK8BcY YWEmZTYhmPZy2os/qODkYARogjhQCJ+9ry9LgExn/IfuDwrM4rpAzup8pUxAc4Ys XesgxwfRSD+k/JFOc7La5qhAF0D3pFDFIHvspK1rjXPYj0lSgmd1A6WkWzNHGTUS Q9EMRL3SZHzsuIwlamHbE2fZtBkhmwx+H8xjz+YmR1dDQjPSGLY1YpAvXACE1rnW n2G3OoZgUWtTEljR3RmBCaC5c1lURv1f/YDG4n6y5UrzZNUB6DUVDOrUKrtO+Y8= =gA9t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151023084510.GC22065>