From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 24 15: 2:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CF837BBB4; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:02:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA11779; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <200004242201.PAA11779@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility In-Reply-To: <14566.956607616@zippy.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Apr 24, 2000 01:20:16 pm" To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Cc: gallatin@cs.duke.edu (Andrew Gallatin), dillon@apollo.backplane.com (Matthew Dillon), phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG {First one bounced by hub with ``out of memory'' error... second attempt} > > Are there any 3rd party NIC klds yet? > > NTMK. It's not quite a kld, but ET Inc's modules are distributed as a .o. Also I know of work underway to support some of the fancier SDL WanNic cards that would have to be kld's or .o's as well, due to NDA on parts of the code used to develope them. -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message