From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 16:39:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F7016A4CF for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:39:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FDA43D5D for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:39:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so173304rne for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:39:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=G7dAPoGihRAyAJ+Dub/7OOmqvZBovRGitOuAjJVpsg/4+YJfXSUdGn2Ibe+P1noQlZUn548+O3BGW2mkiPiEVPXp6hIj1vJRqLBszyGDs0J+48byeRmbeUUe/PDPkb5NN3284eRUjL94hC/Lv50KXAU1jukcX0fRhr2e1iZORi4= Received: by 10.38.10.76 with SMTP id 76mr2599840rnj; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:39:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.165.35 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:39:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:39:16 -0700 From: Nick Pavlica To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050317175913.GT91771@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4237A3A3.3040704@bigfoot.com> <4238F9A7.5050000@bigfoot.com> <20050317175913.GT91771@hub.freebsd.org> cc: Jean Lagarde cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Pavlica List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:39:18 -0000 I have had odd behavior like you are describing with cheap motherboards. I ran all of the memory tests etc, and everything passed with flying colors. Despite passing all of the tests I could throw at the hardware, windows 2000 was very unstable. We ultimately ended up replacing the board. On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:59:13 +0000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:29:43PM -0800, Jean Lagarde wrote: > > Thanks to all who replied. So it seems the consensus is a likely > > hardware issue, and I am leaning that way as well now. I will try the > > suggestion about disabling ACPI however. > > > > To address some of the other comments, that exact CPU-mobo-memory > > configuration worked fine running Win2000 for many years, so I doubt it > > is the problem per se. > > Doesn't rule out bugs in the ACPI support of your motherboard. Some > low-quality motherboards only implement an approximation to the ACPI > spec to a level that gets windows to run. > > Kris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >