From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 23:36:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB18106566B for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06608FC08 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A4CF5C21 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:49:16 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F0B7936.4070303@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:33:10 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F0446B7.4090703@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120104142757.1c77c347@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4F04E648.9090206@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120105121825.656677e4@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20120106221610.00005fbe@unknown> <20120108160316.00003d59@unknown> <4F0A8164.9090502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:36:48 -0000 On 01/10/12 08:28, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On January 9, 2012 3:55:48 PM +1000 Da Rock > wrote: >> >> I just need to work out how to check the checksum against a linux >> source. >> I haven't found that yet. >> > > My brief search was unsuccessful as well. Is it really possible that > the LInux community has abandoned providing checksums for RPM > packages? If so, that boggles the mind. Surely they don't believe > their repositories are unassailable? > I don't know. I believe they have a gpg key they use, at least with their repo system. How that specifically works I don't know.