From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Nov 28 22:25:44 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id WAA15304
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 22:25:44 -0800
Received: from tulpi.interconnect.com.au (root@tulpi.interconnect.com.au [192.189.54.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA15298
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 22:25:34 -0800
Received: (from ahill@localhost) by tulpi.interconnect.com.au id RAA13324
  (8.6.11/IDA-1.6); Wed, 29 Nov 1995 17:24:58 +1100
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 17:24:54 +1100 (EST)
From: Anthony Hill <ahill@interconnect.com.au>
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
cc: Joe Ziskovsky <prefect@prefect.unomaha.edu>, questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Compile problems with 2.1
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951128210754.25291F@latte.eng.umd.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.951129172130.12864C-100000@tulpi.interconnect.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk



> device, and it's NOT an optional device, put it back in.

I am doing this all the time - It would be great if someone popped a few 
extra comments in LINT detailing which devices were optional, and which 
were not. (Trial and error can get a bit tedious)