Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:39:15 +0200 (EET) From: Vladimir Kushnir <kushn@mail.kar.net> To: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bmake/contrib framework for egcs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903140030200.15987-100000@kushnir.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903131406290.68999-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks, I'll try, but what I mean is egcs compiled binaries are bigger
even for C, not C++, and as if memory serves -Os is -O2 subset. So
probably I'll just have to accept this increase in binaries size :-(. Ah
well, it ain't all that much, anyway.
Oh, incidentally, I forgot to add that (when compiling libstdc++ with new
c++ for the first time, it can't find file exception. So perhaps in
gnu/lib/libstdc++/Makefile this part of CFLAGS shoild be
-I${EGCSDIR}/gcc/cp/inc rather than -I${EGCSDIR}/gcc/cp/inc/exception
(after all, ${EGCSDIR}/gcc/cp/inc/exception is a file).
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Vladimir Kushnir wrote:
>
> > BTW, binaries compiled with egcc are still larger than with stock gcc. Is
> > there a way to shrink them (beyond what's possible with -O optimisation)?
>
> Try -Os, -fno-exceptions* -fno-rtti* or any combo of the above.
>
> * Don't do this with libraries, just in case you've got any programs that
> use exceptions or rtti. Obviously this won't work with programs that use
> rtti and/or exceptions.
>
> - alex
>
Regards,
Vladimir
===========================|=======================
Vladimir Kushnir |
kushn@mail.kar.net, | Powered by FreeBSD
kushnir@ap3.bitp.kiev.ua |
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903140030200.15987-100000>