From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 20 22:40:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C341A10656BF for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6888FC12 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5KMeAh8057581 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:40:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m5KMeA0d057580; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:40:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:40:10 GMT Message-Id: <200806202240.m5KMeA0d057580@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: bf Cc: Subject: Re: ports/124764: math/gsl: Add regression-test target X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:40:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/124764; it has been noted by GNATS. From: bf To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/124764: math/gsl: Add regression-test target Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Judging from a number of recent changes to other ports, there seems to be some kind of quality-assurance effort in the ports to provide testing targets to as many ports as possible so that they may be run automatically, under the target "regression-test". If this is the case (and I wish portmgr would tell maintainers about such efforts), then I withdraw my suggestion for altering the patch, and approve the original version. If it's not the case, then just stick with "check". b.