From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 27 22:33:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAF216A4CE for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:33:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jeremino.homeunix.net (jeremino.xs4all.nl [80.126.224.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C5343D2F for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:33:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kees@jeremino.homeunix.net) Received: from jeremina.homeunix.net ([10.0.0.5]) by jeremino.homeunix.net with smtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CYB8U-000DE3-RM; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 23:33:46 +0100 From: Kees Plonsz To: Adam Stroud , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 23:33:47 +0100 References: Lines: 13 Organization: Chaotic User-Agent: KNode/0.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Message-Id: <20041127223349.29C5343D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ACL and tunefs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:33:49 -0000 Adam Stroud wrote: > I did not try that. When I booted into single user more again and tried > the tunefs -a enable / I get a messaged saying that acl was already > enabled. Strange. > The only hope for you is that the enable bit for acl was set, but not yet read by the system. I think you have to reboot and then you have a change that the acl bit is set and read. Te best way is to have another freebsd system to set acl. Or to choose another slice for your acl experiment. The e-slice is easier to change, but its your choice....